<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Documents To Go Brings Doc Editing to iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appcraver.com/documents-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appcraver.com/documents-to-go/</link>
	<description>news and reviews for iphone apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:18:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.appcraver.com/documents-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appcraver.com/?p=20678#comment-5984</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have either D2G or Quickoffice yet, but here&#039;s something important to understand about syncing (I&#039;ve used D2G on other platforms): if the iPhone version is like other versions, you can make edits on the DESKTOP or on the DEVICE, and those EDITS are synchronized! You don&#039;t have to replace the original file on one side or the other. Also, you can have a complex document with all kinds of things that aren&#039;t supported on the MOBILE device that are preserved when you EDIT on the mobile...you can make CHANGES to the document on the mobile and those CHANGES are sent back to your main document on the DESKTOP which still has all the unsupported items (enormous pics, footnotes, etc).

Can someone confirm that the iphone version of D2G functions like the above (as it did on other platforms)? Also, can someone with QuickOffice talk about what happens to non-supported parts of documents that are edited on the phone? For example, if there are footnotes in the document and you edit it on the iPhone, then copy back to your computer, are the footnotes preserved? And am I correct that it isn&#039;t syncing CHANGES, only copying the full document back and forth?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have either D2G or Quickoffice yet, but here&#8217;s something important to understand about syncing (I&#8217;ve used D2G on other platforms): if the iPhone version is like other versions, you can make edits on the DESKTOP or on the DEVICE, and those EDITS are synchronized! You don&#8217;t have to replace the original file on one side or the other. Also, you can have a complex document with all kinds of things that aren&#8217;t supported on the MOBILE device that are preserved when you EDIT on the mobile&#8230;you can make CHANGES to the document on the mobile and those CHANGES are sent back to your main document on the DESKTOP which still has all the unsupported items (enormous pics, footnotes, etc).</p>
<p>Can someone confirm that the iphone version of D2G functions like the above (as it did on other platforms)? Also, can someone with QuickOffice talk about what happens to non-supported parts of documents that are edited on the phone? For example, if there are footnotes in the document and you edit it on the iPhone, then copy back to your computer, are the footnotes preserved? And am I correct that it isn&#8217;t syncing CHANGES, only copying the full document back and forth?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.appcraver.com/documents-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-5965</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appcraver.com/?p=20678#comment-5965</guid>
		<description>Hi Orion,

One person&#039;s essential features may be unimportant to another. Such is the case with software. You may have been disappointed in the lack of MobileMe support, but there are many things Docs To Go does that QuickOffice does not. For example, even though Docs To Go does not sync files with Apple&#039;s $99 a year service, it does support the 2007 versions of Word and Excel, which will appeal to a far broader audience. And QuickOffice  currently lacks support for iWork 09 and the ability to transfer iWork docs through Wi-Fi Connect.

As for file transfer, Docs To Go does for free essentially what you have to pay for with MobileMe. Files transfer pretty seamlessly through the desktop software, which works on PC and Mac. It makes far more sense at launch to offer syncing ability for a wider base of users. And many would find QuickOffice&#039;s inability to use the built-in spellchecker as a deal breaker (along with the hefty $19.99 price tag).

My overall experience with Docs To Go was positive, and I imagine that some of the issues you raised may be addressed through future updates. And not everyone is in love with QuickOffice - probably why Walt Mossberg says it &quot;needs work&quot; and found getting documents into the app &quot;a pain.&quot;  My experience gives me some optimism for Docs To Go, but not enough to leave me clouded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Orion,</p>
<p>One person&#8217;s essential features may be unimportant to another. Such is the case with software. You may have been disappointed in the lack of MobileMe support, but there are many things Docs To Go does that QuickOffice does not. For example, even though Docs To Go does not sync files with Apple&#8217;s $99 a year service, it does support the 2007 versions of Word and Excel, which will appeal to a far broader audience. And QuickOffice  currently lacks support for iWork 09 and the ability to transfer iWork docs through Wi-Fi Connect.</p>
<p>As for file transfer, Docs To Go does for free essentially what you have to pay for with MobileMe. Files transfer pretty seamlessly through the desktop software, which works on PC and Mac. It makes far more sense at launch to offer syncing ability for a wider base of users. And many would find QuickOffice&#8217;s inability to use the built-in spellchecker as a deal breaker (along with the hefty $19.99 price tag).</p>
<p>My overall experience with Docs To Go was positive, and I imagine that some of the issues you raised may be addressed through future updates. And not everyone is in love with QuickOffice &#8211; probably why Walt Mossberg says it &#8220;needs work&#8221; and found getting documents into the app &#8220;a pain.&#8221;  My experience gives me some optimism for Docs To Go, but not enough to leave me clouded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orion</title>
		<link>http://www.appcraver.com/documents-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-5964</link>
		<dc:creator>Orion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appcraver.com/?p=20678#comment-5964</guid>
		<description>Really?  You gave it this high a mark when it&#039;s lacking so much that&#039;s already part of other text editors available on the AppStore?  What about transferring files to MobileMe?  Where&#039;s the ability to change fonts attributes beyond simple bold, italics and color?  In short how does it get as high a mark as your review of QuickOffice when DTG looks and feels more like a Beta product? 

Even the interface to select text for editing is clunky at best.  

I too had high hopes for this title but that shouldn&#039;t cloud a review that many count on before making a purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  You gave it this high a mark when it&#8217;s lacking so much that&#8217;s already part of other text editors available on the AppStore?  What about transferring files to MobileMe?  Where&#8217;s the ability to change fonts attributes beyond simple bold, italics and color?  In short how does it get as high a mark as your review of QuickOffice when DTG looks and feels more like a Beta product? </p>
<p>Even the interface to select text for editing is clunky at best.  </p>
<p>I too had high hopes for this title but that shouldn&#8217;t cloud a review that many count on before making a purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
