<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shazam &#8211; an ear for music</title> <atom:link href="http://www.appcraver.com/shazam-an-ear-for-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.appcraver.com/shazam-an-ear-for-music/</link> <description>App Reviews for the iPhone, iPad and iPod touch</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:33:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Fred Krueger</title><link>http://www.appcraver.com/shazam-an-ear-for-music/#comment-151</link> <dc:creator>Fred Krueger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:17:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.appcraver.com/?p=1694#comment-151</guid> <description>In personal tests I found that Shazam did a much better job than Midori at recognizing music. I also like the fact that in Shazam you only need to click once to sample a tune, while in Midori you need to click and hold for about 10 seconds. Shazam really rocks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In personal tests I found that Shazam did a much better job than Midori at recognizing music. I also like the fact that in Shazam you only need to click once to sample a tune, while in Midori you need to click and hold for about 10 seconds. Shazam really rocks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.appcraver.com @ 2012-02-09 23:12:55 by W3 Total Cache -->
